We provide you a /whm "Reseller" account that allows you to create unlimited Cpanel hosting accounts for yourself and/or customers with limited and/or unlimited hosting features.
In other words, you can create "hosting packages" that are limited in the amount of bandwith, mysql databases, email & ftp accounts, etc., or decide to distribute unlimited hosting packages.
Example: WHM Account Username: demo
Password: demo
After a domain is setup with the /whm admin, you can login to yourdomain/cpanel to configure hosting.
This is a Cpanel Account example:
Username: x3demob
Password: x3demob
This is very simple to use and can be a great source of potential income. Personally, we sell single hosting accounts for $35/yr which is less than $3 a month. Sell 5 packages like that and you've already made your money back plus have profited.
Cost
We charge $4.50/mo. You can configure unlimited amounts of cpanel accounts, and your not limited in bandwith.
Rules & Terms
Only no spamming email and no proxys. Unlike Hostgator who often bans websites that promote using Xrumer, we don't care. Adult sites are okay.
Please feel free to contact us directly to get setup and/or if you have any additional questions or require assistance.
visit cheap reseller hosting
http://dreamyhost.com
Spatial offer:
Free domain reseller
adword and facebook coupon code
24x7 live customer support..
We also provide:
alpha reseller hosting
master reseller
cheap shared hosting
Sunday, September 11, 2011
Monday, August 29, 2011
phpbb forum at 5 minute
cheap shared hosting, alpha reseller hosting
Today I am going to give you a short tutorial to make a forum site using open source script phpbb. Anyone can install phpbb easily on any web server. I will give you a short tutorial describing how to do it.
To start this work you don’t need to know any programming language. You just need to had a minimum knowledge with databases.
What is phpbb?
Phpbb is a forum script. It’s completely free and you can make unlimited forums and categories. You can download it from phpbb.com. You will get everything you would expect from a open source bulletin board script. You can check complete feature list of phpbb here phpbb.com/features..
To install phpbb using ftp and a browser you need:
1 : any database from : MySQL, PostgreSQL, MS SQL or Access via ODBC
2. It can run apache server or IIS.
Its administrator panel is so much user friendly and it allow you do anything.
Lets Start installing Phpbb:
First Download the phpBB files form phpbb.com and Upload The phpBB Files through FTP
When the upload became completed, extract the zip file and change the permission of cofiq.php file to 777.
Now let’s create Database:
• Find Mysql wizard at cpanel
• Create a mysql database
• Remember the database user name and password
Installation
Now we have all the information in our hand. Now lets open our browser and go to http://www./install/install.php
Now lets complete the installation step by step.
Now phpbb is installed on our server.
Administration of your forum
To administer our forum we have to go http://www./ and we have to log in using our administrator id and pass which we set up through installation process.Now click the Administration panel which we will find at the top of the page. No go to tha Forum Admin>Management. Now set up forum and categories.
Now go to Styles admin and set your template. To set another template go Style admin> add. Once you set the template you can cosmism the theme there
Conclusion
With a little bit effort and server cost we can make a professional forum which can give us a much money. If you need any help about domain, server, forum installation, ans site maintaince we are always here to help you. You can get cheap shared hosting at dreamyhost.com We are there to help you. If you get shared hosting within this month from us we will give you $75 adword coupon code free.
Today I am going to give you a short tutorial to make a forum site using open source script phpbb. Anyone can install phpbb easily on any web server. I will give you a short tutorial describing how to do it.
To start this work you don’t need to know any programming language. You just need to had a minimum knowledge with databases.
What is phpbb?
Phpbb is a forum script. It’s completely free and you can make unlimited forums and categories. You can download it from phpbb.com. You will get everything you would expect from a open source bulletin board script. You can check complete feature list of phpbb here phpbb.com/features..
To install phpbb using ftp and a browser you need:
1 : any database from : MySQL, PostgreSQL, MS SQL or Access via ODBC
2. It can run apache server or IIS.
Its administrator panel is so much user friendly and it allow you do anything.
Lets Start installing Phpbb:
First Download the phpBB files form phpbb.com and Upload The phpBB Files through FTP
When the upload became completed, extract the zip file and change the permission of cofiq.php file to 777.
Now let’s create Database:
• Find Mysql wizard at cpanel
• Create a mysql database
• Remember the database user name and password
Installation
Now we have all the information in our hand. Now lets open our browser and go to http://www.
Now lets complete the installation step by step.
Now phpbb is installed on our server.
Administration of your forum
To administer our forum we have to go http://www.
Now go to Styles admin and set your template. To set another template go Style admin> add. Once you set the template you can cosmism the theme there
Conclusion
With a little bit effort and server cost we can make a professional forum which can give us a much money. If you need any help about domain, server, forum installation, ans site maintaince we are always here to help you. You can get cheap shared hosting at dreamyhost.com We are there to help you. If you get shared hosting within this month from us we will give you $75 adword coupon code free.
Saturday, April 9, 2011
Cool and hot premium theme for windows 7 free
আমাদের সাহায্য করুন। আশে পাশে উপরে নিচের বিজ্ঞহাফন এ অন্তত ২ টা চাপ দিয়ে
Friday, April 8, 2011
Microsoft prepping 17 patches for 64 holes
Microsoft will release 17 bulletins next week to fix 64 vulnerabilities across a swath of products including Windows, Office, and Internet Explorer, the company said in its Patch Tuesday preview.
Of the bulletins, nine are rated "critical" and eight are "important," the company said in a TechNet blog post today.
In addition to all versions of Windows; IE6, IE7, and IE8; numerous versions of Office for Windows and the Mac, affected software includes Visual Studio .NET and Visual C++, according to the advisory.
"This month we'll be closing some issues that Microsoft has already previously spoken to, including the SMB Browser (Critical) issue publicly disclosed Feb. 15. Microsoft assessed the situation and reported that although the vulnerability could theoretically allow Remote Code Execution, that was extremely unlikely. To this day, we have seen no evidence of attacks," the company said in its blog post.
"We are also planning a fix for the MHTML vulnerability in Windows, rated Important," the post said. "We alerted people to this issue with Security Advisory 2501696 (including a Fix-It that fully protected customers once downloaded) back in late January. In March, we updated the advisory to let people know we were aware of limited, targeted attacks."
The release represents a large number of bulletins and vulnerabilities addressed at one time for Microsoft. The company issued 17 bulletins in December and plugged a record 49 holes in October.
"Microsoft is planning to release 17 bulletins and a whopping 64 CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) this month, a new CVE record," said Andrew Storms, director of security for nCircle. "That seems like a huge number of bugs but it's actually about what we expected. Ever since the middle of last year Microsoft's bulletin releases generally hit double digits every other month."
Of the bulletins, nine are rated "critical" and eight are "important," the company said in a TechNet blog post today.
In addition to all versions of Windows; IE6, IE7, and IE8; numerous versions of Office for Windows and the Mac, affected software includes Visual Studio .NET and Visual C++, according to the advisory.
"This month we'll be closing some issues that Microsoft has already previously spoken to, including the SMB Browser (Critical) issue publicly disclosed Feb. 15. Microsoft assessed the situation and reported that although the vulnerability could theoretically allow Remote Code Execution, that was extremely unlikely. To this day, we have seen no evidence of attacks," the company said in its blog post.
"We are also planning a fix for the MHTML vulnerability in Windows, rated Important," the post said. "We alerted people to this issue with Security Advisory 2501696 (including a Fix-It that fully protected customers once downloaded) back in late January. In March, we updated the advisory to let people know we were aware of limited, targeted attacks."
The release represents a large number of bulletins and vulnerabilities addressed at one time for Microsoft. The company issued 17 bulletins in December and plugged a record 49 holes in October.
"Microsoft is planning to release 17 bulletins and a whopping 64 CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) this month, a new CVE record," said Andrew Storms, director of security for nCircle. "That seems like a huge number of bugs but it's actually about what we expected. Ever since the middle of last year Microsoft's bulletin releases generally hit double digits every other month."
New fake antivirus accepts SMS payments
There's a new twist with some fake antivirus scareware that has cropped up. It accepts payment via SMS, according to antivirus firm CyberDefender.
Typical rogue security programs infect the system first, then display pop ups warning that the computer is infected, and request payment to clean it up. The new programs are seemingly more genteel, asking for the money before the program is installed and infects the system, said Achal Khetarpal, threat research director at CyberDefender. Of course, a payment does nothing to "fix" a system and means criminals now have your money and possibly your credit card information.
When a potential victim happens upon a Web site hosting the malware, a dialog box pops up that looks very much like an installer window for a legitimate antivirus product, according to screenshots from CyberDefender. It says "Welcome to" and names a popular antivirus software and suggests closing other applications. If the victim falls for the ruse, it then displays a message that says "To complete installation, you must go through activation" and offers several ways to pay, including SMS (Short Message Service), WebMoney, and credit card.
If you click "cancel," the program won't install, compared with typical fake antivirus programs that have already infected the system by the time the victim realizes what is happening and keep displaying the annoying pop-up messages, even after reboot, Khetarpal said.
The company has seen five versions of the rogue security programs masquerading as software from Avast, Norton, McAfee, BitDefender, and RootKitBuster, and they, as usual, target Windows systems.
Khetarpal could not say how widespread the malware is but said he has seen it in a "lot of Web sites" and in relation to search results for popular and trending topics.
Fake AV scammers aren't the only ones to hop on the SMS payment bandwagon. Scammers were found to be seeking payment by SMS for fake browser updates earlier this year, according to GFI Labs.
Typical rogue security programs infect the system first, then display pop ups warning that the computer is infected, and request payment to clean it up. The new programs are seemingly more genteel, asking for the money before the program is installed and infects the system, said Achal Khetarpal, threat research director at CyberDefender. Of course, a payment does nothing to "fix" a system and means criminals now have your money and possibly your credit card information.
When a potential victim happens upon a Web site hosting the malware, a dialog box pops up that looks very much like an installer window for a legitimate antivirus product, according to screenshots from CyberDefender. It says "Welcome to" and names a popular antivirus software and suggests closing other applications. If the victim falls for the ruse, it then displays a message that says "To complete installation, you must go through activation" and offers several ways to pay, including SMS (Short Message Service), WebMoney, and credit card.
If you click "cancel," the program won't install, compared with typical fake antivirus programs that have already infected the system by the time the victim realizes what is happening and keep displaying the annoying pop-up messages, even after reboot, Khetarpal said.
The company has seen five versions of the rogue security programs masquerading as software from Avast, Norton, McAfee, BitDefender, and RootKitBuster, and they, as usual, target Windows systems.
Khetarpal could not say how widespread the malware is but said he has seen it in a "lot of Web sites" and in relation to search results for popular and trending topics.
Fake AV scammers aren't the only ones to hop on the SMS payment bandwagon. Scammers were found to be seeking payment by SMS for fake browser updates earlier this year, according to GFI Labs.
Businesses move on green tech sans Washington
LAGUNA NIGUEL, Calif.--In the absence of leadership from the federal government, businesses are the best vehicle for slowly transitioning society away from fossil fuels.
That's one of the themes from the Fortune Brainstorm Green this week, a conference to explore environmental sustainability at corporations.
Innovation is the only way to address the "technology gap" that exists between the price of fossil fuels and clean-energy technologies, such as solar, wind, and electric vehicles, said Michael Shellenberger, the president of the Breakthrough Institute.
"This huge gulf that still exists between fossil fuels and clean tech has got to be overcome to do anything about climate," Shellenberger said. "We can make low-carbon, less polluting technologies a lot cheaper through innovation." Policies geared at raising fossil fuel prices are unlikely to work, but he suggested a combination of policies, such as military procurement and government programs to accelerate technology development, could bring down the cost of alternatives.
There was clear consensus among attendees that the federal government is not going to pass a comprehensive energy law in the near future to mandate more renewable energy or have big polluters pay for carbon emissions. The previous Congress failed to pass a climate and energy law and this Congress is attempting to scale back the Environmental Protection Agency's powers on air pollutants.
If there won't be bold action on global warming, the thinking goes, people can still agree that the government can play a role advancing clean-energy technologies.
"There's a recognition that we need to put more money into technology," said Jim Rogers, the CEO of utility Duke Energy. "The best hope for the next couple of years at least is that investing in more technology will allow us to provide carbon-free electricity in a more affordable way."
Greening of business
Corporations are vital to getting green technologies into the market either by being customers or when they develop products of their own. Nicholas Parker, the chairman of researcher the Cleantech Group, noted in a session that corporations are becoming active investors in green-tech start-ups.
Many technologies, such as more efficiency lighting and fuel-saving hybrids, are attractive because they improve productivity or save businesses money. Wal-Mart's high-profile sustainability program, for example, has saved the company money and generated revenue through selling products, such as compact fluorescent bulbs.
That's one of the themes from the Fortune Brainstorm Green this week, a conference to explore environmental sustainability at corporations.
Innovation is the only way to address the "technology gap" that exists between the price of fossil fuels and clean-energy technologies, such as solar, wind, and electric vehicles, said Michael Shellenberger, the president of the Breakthrough Institute.
"This huge gulf that still exists between fossil fuels and clean tech has got to be overcome to do anything about climate," Shellenberger said. "We can make low-carbon, less polluting technologies a lot cheaper through innovation." Policies geared at raising fossil fuel prices are unlikely to work, but he suggested a combination of policies, such as military procurement and government programs to accelerate technology development, could bring down the cost of alternatives.
There was clear consensus among attendees that the federal government is not going to pass a comprehensive energy law in the near future to mandate more renewable energy or have big polluters pay for carbon emissions. The previous Congress failed to pass a climate and energy law and this Congress is attempting to scale back the Environmental Protection Agency's powers on air pollutants.
If there won't be bold action on global warming, the thinking goes, people can still agree that the government can play a role advancing clean-energy technologies.
"There's a recognition that we need to put more money into technology," said Jim Rogers, the CEO of utility Duke Energy. "The best hope for the next couple of years at least is that investing in more technology will allow us to provide carbon-free electricity in a more affordable way."
Greening of business
Corporations are vital to getting green technologies into the market either by being customers or when they develop products of their own. Nicholas Parker, the chairman of researcher the Cleantech Group, noted in a session that corporations are becoming active investors in green-tech start-ups.
Many technologies, such as more efficiency lighting and fuel-saving hybrids, are attractive because they improve productivity or save businesses money. Wal-Mart's high-profile sustainability program, for example, has saved the company money and generated revenue through selling products, such as compact fluorescent bulbs.
ouse gives final approval to nix Net neutrality
The U.S. House of Representatives voted this afternoon to overturn controversial Net neutrality regulations, a move that will invite a confrontation with President Obama if the Senate follows suit.
By a 240 to 179 vote that, as expected, fell largely along party lines, the House approved a one-page resolution that says, simply, the regulations adopted by the Federal Communications Commission last December "shall have no force or effect."
All but two Republicans backed the measure, while only six Democrats did.
"Congress has not authorized the Federal Communications Commission to regulate the Internet," said Rep. Greg Walden, an Oregon Republican, during the floor discussion. The agency's move amounts to a worrisome "power grab" that must be blocked, he said.
Not much has changed--except, perhaps, that the debate has become even more partisan--since the last Net neutrality vote nearly five years ago. In June 2006, a Democratic-controlled House also rejected the concept of empowering the FCC to regulate broadband providers, that time by a 269 to 152 vote.
Today's final approval followed a vote earlier this week on procedures for debate, which was approved by a nearly identical vote of 241 to 178.
Rhetoric ran to the extreme during this afternoon's discussion, with politicians from both major parties accusing the other of wanting to stifle innovation and turn the United States' Internet into something more closely resembling Iran's.
Related links
• FCC makes Net neutrality rules official
• Court tosses Verizon, MetroPCS suits against FCC
• House rejects Net neutrality rules
"Phone and cable companies are gatekeepers to the information highway," said Rep. Henry Waxman, a California Democrat. "Without regulation they could choke off innovation." Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi suggested via Twitter that Republicans were wasting their time on this "instead of working" to avoid a government shutdown.
Earlier this week, the White House issued a rare formal veto threat. "If the president is presented with a resolution of disapproval that would not safeguard the free and open Internet, his senior advisers would recommend that he veto the resolution," a statement said. (Obama has not vetoed any legislation since the Republicans gained control of the House.)
A resolution of disapproval is a formal process, outlined in the Congressional Review Act, that permits Congress to overturn decisions of federal agencies. It requires both the House and the Senate to vote, and is subject to a presidential veto, but is not subject to a filibuster and only requires 51 votes to clear the Senate.
This is one of those technology topics that has become starkly partisan: During the 2008 campaign, Obama told CNET that "I will take a backseat to no one in my commitment to Network neutrality." In February, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) announced that "our new majority in the House is committed to using every tool at our disposal to fight a government takeover of the Internet."
On December 23, the FCC released the text of its 194-page document (PDF) with the regulations and accompanying explanations of how broadband providers' business practices will be affected. It had approved them on a 3-2 party line vote two days earlier.
Last April, a federal appeals court unceremoniously slapped down the agency's earlier attempt to impose Net neutrality penalties on Comcast after the company temporarily throttled some BitTorrent transfers.
A second legal challenge to the FCC's regulation has already been filed. Earlier this week, a federal appeals court said it was too early for Verizon and MetroPCS to sue the FCC to overturn the regulations. The ruling wasn't much of a setback: the lawsuit can be refiled after the agency has formally published the final text of the regulations, which it has not yet done.
The Senate has not yet voted on the resolution of disapproval. A parallel version of the legislation in that chamber has 40 sponsors, close to the majority of supporters required.
By a 240 to 179 vote that, as expected, fell largely along party lines, the House approved a one-page resolution that says, simply, the regulations adopted by the Federal Communications Commission last December "shall have no force or effect."
All but two Republicans backed the measure, while only six Democrats did.
"Congress has not authorized the Federal Communications Commission to regulate the Internet," said Rep. Greg Walden, an Oregon Republican, during the floor discussion. The agency's move amounts to a worrisome "power grab" that must be blocked, he said.
Not much has changed--except, perhaps, that the debate has become even more partisan--since the last Net neutrality vote nearly five years ago. In June 2006, a Democratic-controlled House also rejected the concept of empowering the FCC to regulate broadband providers, that time by a 269 to 152 vote.
Today's final approval followed a vote earlier this week on procedures for debate, which was approved by a nearly identical vote of 241 to 178.
Rhetoric ran to the extreme during this afternoon's discussion, with politicians from both major parties accusing the other of wanting to stifle innovation and turn the United States' Internet into something more closely resembling Iran's.
Related links
• FCC makes Net neutrality rules official
• Court tosses Verizon, MetroPCS suits against FCC
• House rejects Net neutrality rules
"Phone and cable companies are gatekeepers to the information highway," said Rep. Henry Waxman, a California Democrat. "Without regulation they could choke off innovation." Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi suggested via Twitter that Republicans were wasting their time on this "instead of working" to avoid a government shutdown.
Earlier this week, the White House issued a rare formal veto threat. "If the president is presented with a resolution of disapproval that would not safeguard the free and open Internet, his senior advisers would recommend that he veto the resolution," a statement said. (Obama has not vetoed any legislation since the Republicans gained control of the House.)
A resolution of disapproval is a formal process, outlined in the Congressional Review Act, that permits Congress to overturn decisions of federal agencies. It requires both the House and the Senate to vote, and is subject to a presidential veto, but is not subject to a filibuster and only requires 51 votes to clear the Senate.
This is one of those technology topics that has become starkly partisan: During the 2008 campaign, Obama told CNET that "I will take a backseat to no one in my commitment to Network neutrality." In February, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) announced that "our new majority in the House is committed to using every tool at our disposal to fight a government takeover of the Internet."
On December 23, the FCC released the text of its 194-page document (PDF) with the regulations and accompanying explanations of how broadband providers' business practices will be affected. It had approved them on a 3-2 party line vote two days earlier.
Last April, a federal appeals court unceremoniously slapped down the agency's earlier attempt to impose Net neutrality penalties on Comcast after the company temporarily throttled some BitTorrent transfers.
A second legal challenge to the FCC's regulation has already been filed. Earlier this week, a federal appeals court said it was too early for Verizon and MetroPCS to sue the FCC to overturn the regulations. The ruling wasn't much of a setback: the lawsuit can be refiled after the agency has formally published the final text of the regulations, which it has not yet done.
The Senate has not yet voted on the resolution of disapproval. A parallel version of the legislation in that chamber has 40 sponsors, close to the majority of supporters required.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)